|
| Globalisation has altered the equations for the Indian manufacturers.
Today, the need to be economically competitive is of utmost importance
and Energy-Efficient Motors offer the manufacturers just that.
All our
Energy - Efficient Motors are characterized
by low values of no-load currents. These result in the superior
values of power factor, through out the operating load range. Overall
efficiencies at partial loads ( 50 %, 75 % ) are also better than
most other brands. Energy Efficient Motors are designed to minimize
losses both in the core and in the windings. Thus, there will be
lesser generation of heat. This leads to a higher in-built thermal
reserve.
|
 |
Our following designs of eff-2 and eff-1 level motors
are operational in the field :
| RPM |
POLE |
kW RATING |
| 3000 |
2 |
7.5, 3.7, 1.5, 0.75, 0.37 |
| 1500 |
4 |
45, 22, 18.5, 15, 11, 9.3,
7.5, 5.5, 3.7, 2.2, 1.5, 1.1, 0.75, 0.37 |
| 1000 |
6 |
18.5, 15, 2.2, 0.75 |
| 750 |
8 |
1.5, 1.1, 0.75 |
Efficiency levels of our following sizes are certified by ERDA
(BIS and NABL approved Lab.)
Efficiency Values of 3 – Ø Squirrel
Cage
Energy Efficient Induction Motor
|
| Rating in kW |
0.75
|
1.1
|
3.7
|
7.5
|
11.0
|
22.0
|
45.0
* |
| Syn. Speed |
1500 |
1500 |
1500 |
1500 |
1500 |
1500 |
1500 |
| Frame Size |
80 |
90 S |
112 M |
132 M |
160 M |
180 L |
225 M |
| Date of Testing |
29.12.95 |
29.100.03 |
31.01.02 |
05.02.03 |
29.10.03 |
28.02.02 |
05.02.03 |
| N.L. Current (A) |
1.13 |
1.14 |
2.89 |
4.82 |
6.77 |
12.04 |
23.36 |
| Eff. at 100 % Load |
75.63 |
78.4 |
85.2 |
87.73 |
89.99 |
90.08 |
- |
| Power Factor at 100
% Load |
0.803 |
0.846 |
0.874 |
0.837 |
0.844 |
0.862 |
- |
| Eff. at 75 % Load |
- |
- |
86.33 |
88.16 |
90.0 |
90.14 |
- |
| Eff. at 50 % Load |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
88.40 |
89.26 |
Conforms to IEEMA-19
|
Eff-2 |
Eff-2 |
Eff-2 |
Eff-2 |
Eff-1 |
Eff-2 |
Eff-2 |
| * Due
to non-availability of loading facilities, 45kW (at ERDA), motor
was tested at 50 % load i.e. 22 kW (partial loading). Efficiency
obtained was 89.26 % and powerfactor – 0.83. |
NOTE :
- Eff-2 level of IEEMA-19 surpases the efficiency values of IS
: 12615, in all cases.
- For most of the above sizes, further design improvements have
already been effected. Thus Eff-1 level can be offered, with the
prior confirmation.
In the event of bulk supplies of any one size, type testing can
be arranged at ERDA, if intimated at the enquiry stage.
Copper Rotor Energy-Efficient Motors :-
There are many international papers on Rotating Machines, advocating
the advantages of copper rotors over the mass produced aluminium
die-cast rotors. The advantage of higher conductivity of copper
over aluminium is just one advantage. Secondly, the slip reduces,
thereby resulting in the further savings in the rotor losses. The
motor runs at higher speed.
We have supplied many designs with copper rotors. Such motors are
being supplied to OEMs, on the regular basis as well as end users
– infrequent buyers of different sizes. The following copper rotor
designs have been built. The motors are operational in the field.
| RPM |
POLE |
kW RATING |
| 1500 |
4 |
45, 30,
18.5 3.7, 1.1 |
| 1000 |
6 |
18.5, 15 |
Special features are built into designs so that the required starting
torque is available for all the above motors. e.g. 45 kW, 1500 RPM,
copper rotor motor drives Centreless Grinding Machine, which has
a high inertia load.
PAY BACK PERIORDS :
In many cases the power consumption data is already generated at
motor users’ premises, using
A : Standard Motors
B : Changing over to our Energy-Efficient
Motors.
Payback periods, accepted by clients, have ranged from six months
to one – and – a half year.
Other Advantages of Enery-Efficient Motors :
- EE motors can withstand wider voltage and frequency fluctuations
and higher
ambient temperatures, without breakdown.
- EE motors can take occasional as well as continuous overloads,
without damaging
winding.
- The life of insulation of EE motors is considerably higher
than that in standard
motors, even when the same grade of insulation materials are used.
- In the event of field repairs, the EE motors would retain its
rated capacity (kW ratings), even when repairs are carried out
by less skilled workers and in inexact conditions. [Stampings
subjected to higher temperatures while removing burnt winding,
incorrect coil sizes, errors in wire gauges etc.]
- When motors run at partial loads, the savings of EE motors are
even more pronounced as compared to the standard motors.
APPLICATIONS :
(A) |
Centreless Grinding Machine |
Case study-I ( 11 kW )
Case study-II ( 18.5 kW ) |
(B) |
Projects |
Case study-III ( 18.5 kW ) |
(C) |
Circular Looms Motor |
Case study-IV ( Looms Motor ) |
(D) |
|
Case study-V ( 1.1 kW ) |
 |
| CASE
STUDY - I |
 |
Running Costs of 11 kW – 1500 RPM Motors :
For Centreless Grinders, the duty is assumed as :
10 Seconds : cutting operation
6 Seconds : idle runnig of wheel.
Whenever the wheel runs idle, the energy is required (output from
motor) to maintain the speed of the wheel and other friction and
windage losses. These would be with-in 10 % of the rated capacity
of the motor. Thus, the is very near to no-load running condition
of motor. When the wheel takes cut, the loading is assumed to be
5.5 kW, approx. (50 % of rated output of motor), as per the data
from Grinding Machine Mfgr.
Consideration : 8000 working hours of the machine
per year and electricity rate of Rs. 5.00 per unit.
|
COMPARISION CHART |
Sr.
No. |
Make |
Typical
Well Known Brand MNC Make |
Polyphase
Motors
E.E. Motor |
| Remarks |
Claims from
Commercial Tech. Literature |
Test Results
at ERDA |
| 1. |
No
Load |
Current |
[A] |
10.4
(Measured Value)
|
6.77 |
| 2. |
Power |
[W] |
754 |
492 |
| 3. |
Saving of Power |
[W] |
- |
262 |
| 4. |
Saving of Energy |
[KWH] |
- |
786 |
| 5. |
Saving |
[Rs.] |
- |
3930/- |
| 6. |
ON
50 %
Load |
Current |
[A] |
13.3
(Back Calculation)
|
11.5 |
| 7. |
Power |
[W] |
6379 |
6193 |
| 8. |
Saving of Power |
[W] |
- |
186 |
| 9. |
Saving of Energy |
[KWH] |
- |
930 |
| 10. |
Saving |
[Rs.] |
- |
4650/- |
| 11. |
Total Savings (5 + 10) |
[Rs.] |
- |
3930 + 4650 = 8580/- |
 |
| CASE
STUDY - II |
 |
Running Costs of 18.5 kW – 1500 RPM Motors
For Centreless Grinders, the duty is assumed as :
10 Seconds : cutting operation
6 Seconds : idle runnig of wheel.
Consideration : 8000 working hours of the machine
and Electricity rate Rs. 5.00 per unit.
| COMPARISION
CHART |
Sr.
No. |
Make |
Typical
Organised Make |
Polyphase
Motors
E.E. Motor |
| Remarks |
Tech. Literature |
Test Results
at ERDA |
| 1. |
No
Load |
Current |
[A] |
20
(Measured Value)
|
11 |
| 2. |
Saving of Power |
[W] |
- |
407 |
| 3. |
Saving of Energy |
[KWH] |
- |
1221 |
| 4. |
Saving |
[Rs.] |
- |
6105/- |
| 5. |
ON
50 %
Load |
Current |
[A] |
26
(Back Calculation)
|
19 |
| 6. |
Saving of Power |
[W] |
- |
900 |
| 7. |
Saving of Energy |
[KWH] |
- |
4500 |
| 8. |
Saving |
[Rs.] |
- |
22500/- |
| 9. |
Total Savings (4 + 8) |
[Rs.] |
- |
6105 + 22500 = 28605/- |
Payback period for premium on the price - 40 days.
 |
| CASE
STUDY - III |
 |
Rating : 18.5 kW / 1000 RPM
| Make |
MNC make
India Energy Efficient
|
Polyphase Morors
E.E. Motor |
Remarks |
Actual Results on Load at
Customer’s end |
| No-Load A
Current |
@ 13.0 |
9.6 |
| Load A
Current |
27.46 |
21.07 |
 |
| CASE
STUDY - IV |
 |
POLYPHASE MOTORS CIRCULAR LOOM MOTORS
| Make |
X
|
Y |
Polyphase Morors
(Special) |
Current Consumed in Amp
|
4.33 |
5.6 |
3.52 |
Power Consumed in Watts
|
2179 |
2818 |
1941 |
| Average Running |
22 |
22 |
22 |
Units Consumed per Day |
48 |
62 |
42.7 |
| |
Polyphase
v/s X
|
Polyphase
v/s Y |
Yearly Savings in Rs.
|
9520 |
35080 |
Pay Back Period in Months
|
11 |
4 |
Considering cost of “Polyphase” make motor = Rs. 8,500/-
Cost of Unit = Rs. 5/-
 |
| CASE
STUDY - V |
 |
Sr.
No. |
Make |
Typical Organised
Make
|
Polyphase Morors
E.E. Motor |
Remarks |
Actual Results on Load at
Customer’s end |
1. |
No-Load - Current
A |
1.83 |
1.14 |
2. |
Load - Current
A |
2.21 |
1.53 |
3. |
Power - W |
1239 |
879 |
4. |
Saving - W |
- |
360 |
5. |
Saving - Rs. |
- |
14,400 |
CONSIDERATION :
8000 working hours of the machine per year and electricity rate
of Rs. 5.00 per unit.
* The pay-back period is within six months.
|